Kuroma Kuroma

binary-studio.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

Custom Software Development Company (binary-studio.com) is a software development site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (65) and its weakest is AI Readiness (63); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 27/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://binary-studio.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 62/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 4.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is binary-studio.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: binary-studio.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 64
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 65
Authority Signals 25% of the score 64
AI Readiness 30% of the score 63

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.9 pts

    On https://binary-studio.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 62/100

    • The response at binary-studio.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at binary-studio.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://binary-studio.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://binary-studio.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.9 pts

    On https://binary-studio.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 44/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.3 pts

    On https://binary-studio.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 27/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 99/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1890 words, 122 paragraphs, 31 lists, 94 images (94 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 51/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 4 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 82/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 22. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 35/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 7 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("icon", "icon", "icon") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 68 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("snapCare", "menu-image", "menu-image").
    • 38 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 94 images but only ~1890 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    15 render-blocking resources. 1845 elements for 1890 words

    • 15 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 62/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 4 placeholder links

    • The response at binary-studio.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 44/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    39 external links, 0 citation phrases, 13 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 88/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 77/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    16 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 8 percentages, 5 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 50/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    7 of 124 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1890 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other software development sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.