Kuroma Kuroma

kuroma.ai scores 73/100 for AI Readiness

Kuroma (kuroma.ai) scores 73/100 (grade A+) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (81) and its weakest is Authority Signals (63); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 34/100 (2 of 81 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.).

Audited URL: https://kuroma.ai

73/100
Grade
A+

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is kuroma.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: kuroma.ai scores 73/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Improve Unique Value Proposition and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 81
Technical Optimization 76
Authority Signals 63
AI Readiness 72

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 1253 words, 32 paragraphs, 5 lists, 1 tables, 2 images (2 with alt text)

  • FAQ schema present. 13 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    6 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, BreadcrumbList, SoftwareApplication, Organization, HowTo, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 88/100

    Average 15 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 93/100

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 64/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Kuroma", "Kuroma").

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 54/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 25/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • 6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 11 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 63/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card