Kuroma Kuroma

cubewise.com scores 62/100 for AI Readiness

Cubewise (cubewise.com) scores 62/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 30 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (75) and its weakest is On-Page Content (51); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).

Audited URL: https://cubewise.com

62/100
Grade
A

This audit is 48 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 48 days ago

Is cubewise.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: cubewise.com scores 62/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup and Fix Schema Markup Issues.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 51
Technical Optimization 75
Authority Signals 60
AI Readiness 64

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 82/100

    Found: 10123 words, 127 paragraphs, 1 lists, 18 images (3 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 15 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 43/100

    No FAQ structure. 9 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No JSON-LD structured data found
  • AI Readability Score Pass 91/100

    Average 11 words/sentence. 148 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 55/100

    H1: 0, H2: 10, H3: 35. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 25/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 18 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 40/100

    Experience: 10/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 10/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    0 external links, 17 citation phrases, 35 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social Links

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →