Kuroma Kuroma

eqm.sk scores 39/100 for AI Readiness

Externý manažér kvality pre potravinárstvo (eqm.sk) scores 39/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 28 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (62) and its weakest is Authority Signals (17); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 0/100 (No author attribution found). That places it above the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://eqm.sk

39/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 18 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 18 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is eqm.sk ready for AI search?

Not yet: eqm.sk scores 39/100 (grade D). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 62
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 56
Authority Signals 25% of the score 17
AI Readiness 30% of the score 27

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +9 pts

    On https://eqm.sk · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 0/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.5 pts

    On https://eqm.sk · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 42/100

    • 26 of 31 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • This page opens 2 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Add a Sitemap directive to robots.txt to help crawlers discover pages
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://eqm.sk · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://eqm.sk · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://eqm.sk · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 78/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1079 words, 103 paragraphs, 4 lists, 29 images (7 with alt text)

    • 22 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 64/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 5 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, Store

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 88/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 5. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 22 of 29 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("EqmSK", "Zavolať", "Napísať e-mail").
    • 2 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 29 images but only ~1079 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    13 render-blocking resources. 919 elements for 1079 words

    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 29 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 26 placeholder links

    • 26 of 31 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 46/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Legal notice, Contact

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 58/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 92 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 67/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 67/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card