Kuroma
www.aten.com scores 17/100 for AI Readiness
www.aten.com scores 17/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 19 Jun 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (56) and its weakest is AI Readiness (1); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).
Audited URL: https://www.aten.com
This audit is 89 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is www.aten.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: www.aten.com scores 17/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.
Category scores
This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
The 15 checks this audit confirms it scored
Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 4 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 75 words
- Content length (75 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
-
Not counted on every kind of page or in every language, and this audit recorded neither this page’s type nor its language, so its share of the score is left out
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
- No JSON-LD structured data found
-
Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 1, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.
- Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
-
Media Accessibility Not measured
Not counted on every kind of page, and this audit did not record this page’s type, so its share of the score is left out
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas
-
0 scripts, 0 stylesheets. 0/0 lazy-loaded images.
-
Missing viewport
- Missing viewport meta tag
-
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable
- Missing canonical tag
Authority Signals
-
Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out
Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL
- No privacy policy link found
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables
- No FAQ structure detected
-
Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No article publish/modified dates in metadata
-
0 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.
- No case studies or concrete examples found
-
Score: 0/100
-
Raw HTML Availability Not measured
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card