Kuroma Kuroma

peakd.com scores 33/100 for AI Readiness

PeakD (peakd.com) is a Web3 Social Media and Blogging Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 33/100 (grade F), audited 14 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (54) and its weakest is AI Readiness (18); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://peakd.com

33/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 43/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 32 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 32 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is peakd.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: peakd.com scores 33/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 39
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 30
AI Readiness 30% of the score 18

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.4 pts

    On https://peakd.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 43/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 9 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 18 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://peakd.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://peakd.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6 pts

    On https://peakd.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 15/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://peakd.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 60/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 403 words, 6 lists, 13 images (13 with alt text)

    • Content length (403 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 64/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 38/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 13 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("PeakD", "Hive Keychain", "HAS Login").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 13 images but only ~403 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    7 render-blocking resources. 385 elements for 403 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 9 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 15/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 37/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Social profiles (2)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 56/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 21 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 20/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 20/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →