Kuroma Kuroma

www.borowkowy-raj.pl scores 31/100 for AI Readiness

Borówkowy Raj (www.borowkowy-raj.pl) scores 31/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 29 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (50) and its weakest is Authority Signals (10); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.borowkowy-raj.pl

31/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 29/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 9.2 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is www.borowkowy-raj.pl ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.borowkowy-raj.pl scores 31/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 50
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 38
Authority Signals 25% of the score 10
AI Readiness 30% of the score 27

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +9.2 pts

    On https://www.borowkowy-raj.pl · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 29/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 5 of 49 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.borowkowy-raj.pl is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 17 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +7.8 pts

    On https://www.borowkowy-raj.pl · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 13/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts

    On https://www.borowkowy-raj.pl · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.borowkowy-raj.pl · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://www.borowkowy-raj.pl · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 89/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,239 words, 14 paragraphs, 11 lists, 14 images (14 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 84/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 14 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 76/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 4, H2: 7, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (4) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 49/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 8 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Borówkowy Raj", "Borówka Amerykańska", "Borówkowy Raj").
    • 12 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 30/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    30 render-blocking resources. 404 elements for 1,239 words

    • 30 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 5 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 5 of 49 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.borowkowy-raj.pl is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 15/100

    9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 13/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Legal notice

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 24 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 5/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 37/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 28 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 27/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 27/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,239 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card