Kuroma Kuroma

fengshuibedroom.app scores 47/100 for AI Readiness

Feng Shui Bedroom Analyzer (fengshuibedroom.app) scores 47/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 17 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (66) and its weakest is AI Readiness (33); the biggest single gap is Heading Hierarchy at 0/100 (No headings a reader can see). That places it in the top quartile of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://fengshuibedroom.app

47/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 12 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 12 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is fengshuibedroom.app ready for AI search?

Partly: fengshuibedroom.app scores 47/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Optimize Heading Structure.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 55
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 33

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://fengshuibedroom.app · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • 9 of 39 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at fengshuibedroom.app is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 17 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at fengshuibedroom.app — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts

    On https://fengshuibedroom.app · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://fengshuibedroom.app · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://fengshuibedroom.app · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 21/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://fengshuibedroom.app · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 91/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,286 words, 57 paragraphs, 12 lists, 8 images (8 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 94/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 14 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, SoftwareApplication, HowTo, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • No headings a reader can see
  • Media Accessibility Partial 67/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3181ms). 3 render-blocking resources. 713 elements for 1,286 words

    • Server response was slow (3181ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 7 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 39 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at fengshuibedroom.app is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 15/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 72/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 38/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 3 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 21/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 109 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,286 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card