Kuroma Kuroma

alhena.ai scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Alhena AI (alhena.ai) is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is Authority Signals (50); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 20 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://alhena.ai

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 45/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is alhena.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: alhena.ai scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 67
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 50
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +5 pts

    On https://alhena.ai · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 45/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://alhena.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 20 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://alhena.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +3.9 pts

    On https://alhena.ai · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 57/100

    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.8 pts

    On https://alhena.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 46/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 93/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1433 words, 281 paragraphs, 23 lists, 169 images (166 with alt text)

    • 3 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/images/home/ai-shopping-assistant/chat-bubble-1.svg, /assets/images/home/ai-shopping-assistant/chat-bubble-2.svg, /assets/images/home/ai-shopping-assistant/chat-bubble-3.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 11 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 20 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 95/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 20. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 35/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 169 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 134 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Alhena", "Alhena AI", "Alhena AI").
    • 98 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 169 images but only ~1433 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 2072 elements for 1433 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 139 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 46/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 45/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 17 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 57/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (2)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 80/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    17 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 17 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 66/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    8 of 122 passages carry a figure, 5 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 58/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1433 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites

Other Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.