Kuroma Kuroma

georank.kr scores 75/100 for AI Readiness

지오랭크(GeoRank) (georank.kr) is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 75/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is AI Readiness (80) and its weakest is Authority Signals (66); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 26/100 (No author attribution found). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://georank.kr

75/100
Grade
A+

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 26/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 5.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is georank.kr ready for AI search?

Largely yes: georank.kr scores 75/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 78
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 80

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://georank.kr · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 26/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://georank.kr · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 105 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 22 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts

    On https://georank.kr · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 33/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +2.7 pts

    On https://georank.kr · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 48/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.3 pts

    On https://georank.kr · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 75/100

    • Add a references or sources section

The 18 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 78/100

    7% of the overall score

    Found: 1874 words, 46 paragraphs, 10 lists, 2 tables

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 91/100

    7% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 33/100

    4.8% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, ProfessionalService, Person, Organization, WebPage, CollectionPage, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 99/100

    3.2% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 96/100

    3% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 14. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 789 elements for 1874 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 105 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 4 citation phrases, 21 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 87/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 76/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 33 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 2 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 100/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 17 percentages, 7 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 48/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    13 of 167 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 66/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 66/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1874 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites

Other Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.