Kuroma Kuroma

surferseo.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

Positive Surfer (surferseo.com) is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (82) and its weakest is On-Page Content (55); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://surferseo.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 51/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is surferseo.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: surferseo.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 55
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 60
Authority Signals 25% of the score 82
AI Readiness 30% of the score 67

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.4 pts

    On https://surferseo.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 51/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 47 of 226 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 84 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://surferseo.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.4 pts

    On https://surferseo.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 32/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://surferseo.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +2.2 pts

    On https://surferseo.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 70/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 15 of your 37 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3002 words, 95 paragraphs, 12 lists, 112 images (14 with alt text)

    • 98 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 32/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, WebPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 14 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 19. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 26/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 98 of 112 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Bolt", "ClickUp", "Hostinger").
    • 83 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 112 images but only ~3002 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 2503 elements for 3002 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 31 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 51/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 47 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 47 of 226 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Pass 76/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 25/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Pass 90/100

    9% of the overall score

    37 external links, 3 citation phrases, 34 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 80/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 70/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 37 headings open a quotable passage, 6 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 78/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 26 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 85/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    27 of 201 passages carry a figure, 9 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3002 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites

Other Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.