Kuroma Kuroma

rikei.co.jp scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

TOP PAGE (rikei.co.jp) is a IT Infrastructure / Cloud site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is Authority Signals (35); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 373 IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://rikei.co.jp

49/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 23/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 6.9 points off the overall score.

Updated 5 days ago

Top 25% in IT Infrastructure / Cloud Median 40 · Top quartile 46 · across 373 audited sites in IT Infrastructure / Cloud

Is rikei.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: rikei.co.jp scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 42
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 35
AI Readiness 30% of the score 49

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +6.9 pts

    On https://rikei.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 23/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://rikei.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://rikei.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 21/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.5 pts

    On https://rikei.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 27/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Hedged language is frequent (8 hedge words per 100 sentences), which weakens citation-worthiness
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +3.7 pts

    On https://rikei.co.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 59/100

    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 70/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 642 words, 35 paragraphs, 30 lists, 10 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (642 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 8 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 14 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 93/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 7. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 8 of 10 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("RIKEI CORPORATION", "RIKEI CORPORATION").
    • 5 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3381ms). 12 render-blocking resources. 503 elements for 642 words

    • Server response was slow (3381ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 63 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 23/100

    9% of the overall score

    2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 59/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (2)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 52/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 14 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 27/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Hedged language is frequent (8 hedge words per 100 sentences), which weakens citation-worthiness
  • Content Freshness Partial 57/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 2/19/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 40/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 38 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 70/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    642 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites

Other IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.