Kuroma Kuroma

shareout.site scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

ShareOut (shareout.site) is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is Authority Signals (47); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://shareout.site

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is shareout.site ready for AI search?

Largely yes: shareout.site scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 74
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 53

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://shareout.site · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.4 pts

    On https://shareout.site · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 23/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://shareout.site · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://shareout.site · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 42/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.7 pts

    On https://shareout.site · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 39/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2786 words, 74 paragraphs, 4 lists, 1 tables, 48 images (5 with alt text)

    • 43 images missing alt text (e.g. /brand/agents/claude.svg, /brand/agents/chatgpt.png, /brand/agents/gemini.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 69/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 7 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 39/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 97/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 9. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 20/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 35 of 40 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Slack", "Claude", "ChatGPT").
    • 15 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 1656 elements for 2786 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links

    • 5 of 121 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 23/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    13 external links, 0 citation phrases, 25 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 42/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (1)

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 97/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    17 of 33 headings open a quotable passage, 11 definitions, 2 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 58/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    6 of 181 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 6 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2786 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited software industry sites

Other software industry sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.