Kuroma Kuroma

planet.com.tw scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

Welcome to PLANET Technology (planet.com.tw) is a IT Infrastructure / Cloud site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (67) and its weakest is AI Readiness (38); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 446 IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://planet.com.tw

49/100
Grade
C

Room for improvement. Focus on high-priority recommendations.

Updated today

Top 25% in IT Infrastructure / Cloud Median 41 · Top quartile 47 · across 446 audited sites in IT Infrastructure / Cloud

Is planet.com.tw ready for AI search?

Partly: planet.com.tw scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 50
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 67
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 38

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://planet.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://planet.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.3 pts

    On https://planet.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 19/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.4 pts

    On https://planet.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 66/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 19 of 254 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Add a Sitemap directive to robots.txt to help crawlers discover pages
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4.4 pts

    On https://planet.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 39/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 3 of your 15 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 74/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 905 words, 2 paragraphs, 40 lists, 8 tables, 81 images (16 with alt text)

    • Content length (905 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 65 images missing alt text (e.g. /storage/products/49942/box_CSG-800.jpg, /storage/news/49251/cnews_20260629_web.png, /storage/theme/arrow_news_previous.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 19/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 97/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 7. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 31/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 65 of 81 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo", "logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Smart Manufacturing").
    • 32 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    2% of the overall score

    5 render-blocking resources. 1079 elements for 905 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 66/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 19 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 19 of 254 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 39/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    11 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 64/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 39/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 8 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 60 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 9 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 44/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 44/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    905 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for IT Infrastructure / Cloud · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai