Kuroma Kuroma

similarweb.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

Similarweb (similarweb.com) is a SEO / Content Marketing site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is AI Readiness (51); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 272 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://similarweb.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 25/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 4.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 272 audited sites in MarTech

Is similarweb.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: similarweb.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 88
Authority Signals 25% of the score 77
AI Readiness 30% of the score 51

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.9 pts

    On https://similarweb.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 25/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://similarweb.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://similarweb.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.9 pts

    On https://similarweb.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 23/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.7 pts

    On https://similarweb.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 49/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 12 of your 37 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 92/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1395 words, 71 paragraphs, 12 lists, 65 images (64 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 25/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 90/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 86/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 28. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 65 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 6 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Logo", "Logo", "Logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 11 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("tag icon", "banner icon", "Analyze websites").
    • 57 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 2240 elements for 1395 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 13 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 63/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 7/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    33 external links, 0 citation phrases, 14 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 94/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    12 of 37 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 13 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 23/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 117 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 71/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 71/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1395 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited SEO / Content Marketing sites

Other SEO / Content Marketing sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.