Kuroma Kuroma

drinknumin.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

drinknumin.com is a Food & Beverage / CPG site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,715 Food & Beverage / CPG sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://drinknumin.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 33/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 45 days ago

Top 25% in Food & Beverage / CPG Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 1,715 audited sites in Food & Beverage / CPG

Is drinknumin.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: drinknumin.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 67
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 57
AI Readiness 30% of the score 62

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.7 pts

    On https://drinknumin.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 33/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://drinknumin.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4.4 pts

    On https://drinknumin.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 23/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://drinknumin.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.7 pts

    On https://drinknumin.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 79/100

    • 2 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • This page opens 21 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2487 words, 204 paragraphs, 61 images (58 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 3 images missing alt text (e.g. //drinknumin.com/cdn/shop/files/Numin_Feature_Graphic_1.webp?v=1781743116&width=800, //drinknumin.com/cdn/shop/files/pouch-pdp_11zon.jpg?v=1779107360&width=800, //drinknumin.com/cdn/shop/files/f9bccbc6ec8e36…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 81/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 7 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 99/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 14, H3: 29. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 46/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 61 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 46 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Executives", "Judges", "Doctors").
    • 48 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 61 images but only ~2487 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 2237 elements for 2487 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 17 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 79/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • 2 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 33/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 27 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 78/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 79/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    10 of 44 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 23/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 11/21/2025

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 53/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 149 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2487 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Food & Beverage / CPG sites

Other Food & Beverage / CPG sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.