Kuroma Kuroma

nic.ad.jp scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

Japan Network Information Center (nic.ad.jp) is a IT Infrastructure / Cloud site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 44/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (61) and its weakest is Authority Signals (27); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 5/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it above the median of the 373 IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://nic.ad.jp

44/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 21/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 18 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 18 days ago

Above the median in IT Infrastructure / Cloud Median 40 · Top quartile 46 · across 373 audited sites in IT Infrastructure / Cloud

Is nic.ad.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: nic.ad.jp scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 49
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 27
AI Readiness 30% of the score 41

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add Trust Signals up to +7.1 pts

    On https://nic.ad.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 21/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://nic.ad.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://nic.ad.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://nic.ad.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.3 pts

    On https://nic.ad.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 24/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 836 words, 14 paragraphs, 36 lists, 30 images (30 with alt text)

    • Content length (836 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 40/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 1, H3: 3. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 18 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Logo:JPNIC", "imstagram", "facebook").
    • 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 30 images but only ~836 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    23 render-blocking resources. 929 elements for 836 words

    • 23 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 66/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 7 of 293 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 24/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    22 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 21/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 45/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 5 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/3/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 81 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 58/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    836 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites

Other IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.