Kuroma
truvisory.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness
Truvisory® (truvisory.com) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (89) and its weakest is Authority Signals (60); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 23/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://truvisory.com
The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 23/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 5 points off the overall score.
This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services
Is truvisory.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: truvisory.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5 pts
On https://truvisory.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 23/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts
On https://truvisory.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.2 pts
On https://truvisory.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 40/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://truvisory.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts
On https://truvisory.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 29/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1338 words, 19 paragraphs, 11 lists, 12 images (12 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 3 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ProfessionalService, Person, WebSite, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, VideoObject
-
3% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Truvisory", "Truvisory®", "Truvisory").
- 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
0 render-blocking resources. 690 elements for 1338 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 10 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links
- 7 of 98 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
22 external links, 0 citation phrases, 17 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (5)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
10 of 17 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 2 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 8/8/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
13 of 111 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 5 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 81/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1338 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Consulting / Professional Services sites
- AI Development Company & Engineering Partner (groovyweb.co) · 75/100
- Business Setup in Dubai & UAE Company Formation (dubaistartbusiness.com) · 71/100
- indapoint.com · 69/100
- NexSphere (nexsphere.in) · 69/100
- Software Development Outsourcing Company (qarea.com) · 69/100
- Search Engine Journal (searchenginejournal.com) · 69/100
Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.