Kuroma
popl.co scores 69/100 for AI Readiness
Popl (popl.co) is a Forms & Surveys site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is AI Readiness (57); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://popl.co
The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.
This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is popl.co ready for AI search?
Largely yes: popl.co scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://popl.co · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.6 pts
On https://popl.co · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 38/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts
On https://popl.co · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.9 pts
On https://popl.co · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 58/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add Trust Signals up to +2.9 pts
On https://popl.co · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 68/100
- No contact information easily accessible
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 4309 words, 169 paragraphs, 19 lists, 49 images (48 with alt text)
- 1 images missing alt text (e.g. //popl.co/cdn/shop/files/5fx1d0qi7aind6c3ppodupyi6n7b_1.png?v=1760715936&width=500)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 1 question headings. 10 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 19 words/sentence. 14 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 13, H3: 8. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 of 49 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 20 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Popl", "Popl", "Popl").
- 16 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
8 render-blocking resources. 3158 elements for 4309 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 30 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 12 placeholder links
- 12 of 204 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
25 external links, 0 citation phrases, 26 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
11 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
24 of 197 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 901 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 74/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
4309 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Forms & Surveys sites
- mobilocard.com · 71/100
Other Forms & Surveys sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.