Kuroma Kuroma

mobilocard.com scores 71/100 for AI Readiness

mobilocard.com is a Forms & Surveys site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 71/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (76) and its weakest is Authority Signals (62); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 27/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization, FAQPage, SoftwareApplication). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://mobilocard.com

71/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 55/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 4.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is mobilocard.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: mobilocard.com scores 71/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 76
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 76
Authority Signals 25% of the score 62
AI Readiness 30% of the score 70

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://mobilocard.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.9 pts

    On https://mobilocard.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 44/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://mobilocard.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 20 of 97 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 37 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.3 pts

    On https://mobilocard.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 27/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +3.1 pts

    On https://mobilocard.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 45/100

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3552 words, 20 paragraphs, 7 lists, 158 images (124 with alt text)

    • 34 images missing alt text.avif)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 99/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 19 question headings. 7 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization, FAQPage, SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Pass 84/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 82/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 20, H3: 53. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 34 of 158 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 17 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Target logo", "KW logo", "Google logo").
    • 105 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 158 images but only ~3552 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    5 render-blocking resources. 1478 elements for 3552 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 40 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 20 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 20 of 97 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 44/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 29 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 82/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 88/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    52 of 74 headings open a quotable passage, 7 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 65/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 10 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 45/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 5/15/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 74/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    18 of 207 passages carry a figure, 5 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3552 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Forms & Surveys sites

Other Forms & Surveys sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.