Kuroma
kuroma.ai scores 74/100 for AI Readiness
Kuroma (kuroma.ai) is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 74/100 (grade A+), audited 14 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (80) and its weakest is Authority Signals (70); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 33/100 (6 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, BreadcrumbList, SoftwareApplication, Organization, HowTo, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 31,056 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://kuroma.ai
The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 71/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 3.8 points off the overall score.
This audit is 10 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,056 audited sites
Is kuroma.ai ready for AI search?
Largely yes: kuroma.ai scores 74/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.8 pts
On https://kuroma.ai · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 71/100
- 3 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- This page opens 11 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.4 pts
On https://kuroma.ai · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 34/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
- Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3 pts
On https://kuroma.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 33/100
- Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3 pts
On https://kuroma.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 60/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.9 pts
On https://kuroma.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 59/100
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1,259 words, 32 paragraphs, 5 lists, 1 tables, 2 images (2 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 13 question headings. 4 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
6 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, BreadcrumbList, SoftwareApplication, Organization, HowTo, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 15 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Kuroma", "Kuroma").
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
6 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
1 render-blocking resources. 454 elements for 1,259 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links
- 3 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 25/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 11 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
15 of 26 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
1 original data indicators, 6 percentages, 1 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 8/2/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
2 of 81 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 80/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1,259 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites
- Kuroma (kuroma.ai) · 76/100
- 지오랭크(GeoRank) (georank.kr) · 75/100
- GrackerAI (gracker.ai) · 74/100
- Award Winning Digital Marketing Agency in Hong Kong (firstpage.hk) · 69/100
- Keyword Rank Tracker and AI Visibility Tracker (keyword.com) · 68/100
- semai.ai · 67/100
Other Generative Engine Optimization (GEO/AIO) sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.