Kuroma
www.lingofloat.com scores 43/100 for AI Readiness
Lingofloat (www.lingofloat.com) scores 43/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (67) and its weakest is Authority Signals (23); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 5/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check).
Audited URL: https://www.lingofloat.com
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is www.lingofloat.com ready for AI search?
Partly: www.lingofloat.com scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 1568 words, 34 paragraphs, 3 lists, 3 images (3 with alt text)
-
FAQ section found (no schema). 9 question headings. 4 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
-
Average 13 words/sentence. 14 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 23. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Lingofloat logo", "Lingofloat Demo").
- 2 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
Fetch succeeded but was slow (3325ms). 2 render-blocking resources. 681 elements for 1568 words
- Server response was slow (3325ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
-
Has viewport. 2 responsive images. has theme-color
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 8 placeholder links
- 8 of 13 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at www.lingofloat.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/10. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
2 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures
-
2 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
References last year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
0 of 67 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
Score: 63/100
-
1568 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card