Kuroma Kuroma

sensory.com scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

Sensory (sensory.com) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (54); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 0/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://sensory.com

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 20/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 6 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is sensory.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: sensory.com scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 75
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 63
AI Readiness 30% of the score 54

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://sensory.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.4 pts

    On https://sensory.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 40/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://sensory.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.5 pts

    On https://sensory.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 22/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2 pts

    On https://sensory.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 71/100

    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2125 words, 51 paragraphs, 13 lists, 159 images (159 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 86/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 7 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 95/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 15, H3: 6. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 33/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 115 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Sensory", "btn-white-right-arrow", "btn-white-right-arrow").
    • 59 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 159 images but only ~2125 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    16 render-blocking resources. 1125 elements for 2125 words

    • 16 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 10 placeholder links

    • 10 of 101 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 71/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Needs work 40/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 81/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 78/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    12 of 35 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 6/26/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 153 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 73/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 73/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2125 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.