Kuroma Kuroma

hartzai.com scores 75/100 for AI Readiness

AI Consultancy UK (hartzai.com) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 75/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (66); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 36/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, Person, EducationalOccupationalCredential, GovernmentOrganization, FAQPage, Review). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://hartzai.com

75/100
Grade
A+

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 43/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is hartzai.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: hartzai.com scores 75/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 82
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 73

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4 pts

    On https://hartzai.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 43/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://hartzai.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 83 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 26 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts

    On https://hartzai.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3 pts

    On https://hartzai.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 60/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.9 pts

    On https://hartzai.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 36/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3332 words, 114 paragraphs, 15 lists, 13 images (13 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 20 question headings. 8 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 36/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, Person, EducationalOccupationalCredential, GovernmentOrganization, FAQPage, Review

  • AI Readability Score Partial 67/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 12 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 96/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 42. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 71/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Hartz AI", "Lancashire FA logo", "Checkatrade logo").

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 1255 elements for 3332 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 11 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 83 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 43/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    11 external links, 1 citation phrases, 24 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 86/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 86/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    30 of 62 headings open a quotable passage, 9 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 60/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 19 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 69/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 3/26/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 70/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    13 of 176 passages carry a figure, 5 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3332 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.