Kuroma Kuroma

synthesys.io scores 72/100 for AI Readiness

AI Video Agent for Marketing Teams (synthesys.io) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 72/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is Authority Signals (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 13/100 (13 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, WebPage, FAQPage, Review). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://synthesys.io

72/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 32/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.8 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is synthesys.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: synthesys.io scores 72/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 75
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 57
AI Readiness 30% of the score 75

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://synthesys.io · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 32/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://synthesys.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://synthesys.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://synthesys.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.7 pts

    On https://synthesys.io · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 79/100

    • 4 of 137 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: CCBot. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • This page opens 23 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2724 words, 159 paragraphs, 3 lists, 1 tables, 3 images (3 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 13 question headings. 7 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    13 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, WebPage, FAQPage, Review

  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 17, H3: 21. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Synthesys AI", "Architecture Diagram", "Synthesys AI").
    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 28 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    13 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 1726 elements for 2724 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 3 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 79/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 137 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: CCBot. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 32/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    55 external links, 0 citation phrases, 28 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 78/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 86/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    25 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 10 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 89/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 4/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 58/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 168 passages carry a figure, 4 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 96/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 96/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2724 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.