Kuroma Kuroma

qbiqal.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

Qbiqal (qbiqal.com) is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (72) and its weakest is On-Page Content (62); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, Speakable, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://qbiqal.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 64/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 4.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is qbiqal.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: qbiqal.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 62
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 72
Authority Signals 25% of the score 70
AI Readiness 30% of the score 63

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.7 pts

    On https://qbiqal.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 64/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 of 46 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 28 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://qbiqal.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://qbiqal.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://qbiqal.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://qbiqal.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

The 18 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 70/100

    7% of the overall score

    Found: 4256 words, 49 paragraphs, 8 lists

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 56/100

    7% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.8% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, Speakable, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3.2% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    3% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 20, H3: 17. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3764ms). 5 render-blocking resources. 2360 elements for 4256 words

    • Server response was slow (3764ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 64/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 6 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 of 46 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 70/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 79 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 88/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    27 of 38 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 63 percentages, 16 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 64/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    15 of 268 passages carry a figure, 6 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    4256 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited software industry sites

Other software industry sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.