Kuroma Kuroma

tsmc.com scores 54/100 for AI Readiness

tsmc.com is a Manufacturing / Industrial site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 54/100 (grade B), audited 25 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (83) and its weakest is AI Readiness (43); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://tsmc.com

54/100
Grade
B

This audit is 53 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 53 days ago

Is tsmc.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: tsmc.com scores 54/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 46
Technical Optimization 83
Authority Signals 51
AI Readiness 43

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 1996 words, 22 paragraphs, 71 lists, 14 images (13 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /themes/custom/tsmc_dcom/images/career_1920x580.jpg)
  • No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 78/100

    Average 20 words/sentence. 18 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 35/100

    H1: 0, H2: 9, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Partial 50/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 14 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 8 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 14 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 38/100

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 10/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 151 external links, 2 citation phrases, 1 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 45/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    References current year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 45/100

    21 unique value phrases, 2 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1996 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Manufacturing / Industrial sites

Other Manufacturing / Industrial sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.