Kuroma Kuroma

opus.pro scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

OpusClip (opus.pro) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (77) and its weakest is AI Readiness (58); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://opus.pro

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 4.5% of the total, which takes 4.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is opus.pro ready for AI search?

Largely yes: opus.pro scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 68
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 65
AI Readiness 30% of the score 58

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://opus.pro · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://opus.pro · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://opus.pro · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +3.4 pts

    On https://opus.pro · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 62/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://opus.pro · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2292 words, 46 paragraphs, 121 images (99 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 22 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 6 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 83/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 28/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 22 of 121 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 60 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Podcasters", "Podcasters", "AI clipping").
    • 72 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 121 images but only ~2292 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    8 render-blocking resources. 1720 elements for 2292 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 9 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 13 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 13 of 140 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 63/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 25/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    51 external links, 0 citation phrases, 38 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 67/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 32 percentages, 16 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 68/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    46 of 139 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2292 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.