Kuroma Kuroma

qps.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

QPS (qps.com) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (78) and its weakest is On-Page Content (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 43 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://qps.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 25/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 4.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is qps.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: qps.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 57
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 78
Authority Signals 25% of the score 64
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.9 pts

    On https://qps.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 25/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://qps.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 43 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4 pts

    On https://qps.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 47/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.9 pts

    On https://qps.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 24/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://qps.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 48/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2344 words, 26 paragraphs, 62 lists, 21 images (20 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 43 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 82/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 12 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 19. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 21 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 15 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("QPS logo", "QPS Logo", "QPS logo").
    • 13 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 26/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (17649ms). 69 render-blocking resources. 2941 elements for 2344 words

    • Server response was slow (17649ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 69 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 21 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 21 of 317 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 48/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 1 citation phrases, 4 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 64/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    19 of 38 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 47/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    5 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/6/2026

  • 5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 127 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 71/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 71/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Consulting / Professional Services sites

Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.