Kuroma Kuroma

solstencre.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Commercial Real Estate Analysis Software (solstencre.com) is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (83) and its weakest is Authority Signals (52); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 13/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, VideoObject, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://solstencre.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is solstencre.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: solstencre.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 68
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 83
Authority Signals 25% of the score 52
AI Readiness 30% of the score 54

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://solstencre.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://solstencre.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 26/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://solstencre.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://solstencre.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +3.6 pts

    On https://solstencre.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 37/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1565 words, 42 paragraphs, 6 lists, 1 tables, 11 images (11 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 63/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 2 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, VideoObject, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 91/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 23. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 73/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Solsten").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    0 render-blocking resources. 606 elements for 1565 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 111 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    15 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 90/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    17 of 34 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 37/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 6/1/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 30/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 88 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 95/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1565 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited software industry sites

Other software industry sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.