Kuroma Kuroma

cloudmile.ai scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

CloudMile (cloudmile.ai) is a Influencer Marketing site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 46/100 (grade C), audited 2 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (54) and its weakest is Technical Optimization (42); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 6/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://cloudmile.ai

46/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 29/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 9.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 14 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 14 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is cloudmile.ai ready for AI search?

Partly: cloudmile.ai scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 46
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 42
Authority Signals 25% of the score 54
AI Readiness 30% of the score 43

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +9.2 pts

    On https://cloudmile.ai · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 29/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 11 of 106 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at cloudmile.ai is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 27 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.6 pts

    On https://cloudmile.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 12/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://cloudmile.ai · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://cloudmile.ai · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 39/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4.2 pts

    On https://cloudmile.ai · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 42/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 4 of your 12 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1212 words, 183 paragraphs, 6 lists, 41 images (2 with alt text)

    • 39 images missing alt text (e.g. /upload/2026_08_06/21_20260806153252tvzvr8JYy0.png, /upload/2026_04_28/6_20260428164422jxgmxeWSz2.png, /upload/design/index/pic_06_300x300.jpg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 83/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 7. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 12/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 39 of 41 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("CloudMile Logo", "CloudMile Logo").
    • 31 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 41 images but only ~1212 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 30/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 1765 elements for 1212 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 10 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 11 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 11 of 106 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at cloudmile.ai is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 59/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 39/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 42/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 12 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 12/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 73/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 4/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 27/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 74 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 65/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 65/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1212 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Influencer Marketing sites

Other Influencer Marketing sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.