Kuroma
genealogy.jp scores 55/100 for AI Readiness
Genealogical Institute of Japan (genealogy.jp) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 55/100 (grade B), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (64) and its weakest is AI Readiness (47); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://genealogy.jp
The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 59/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.
Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services
Is genealogy.jp ready for AI search?
Mostly, with gaps: genealogy.jp scores 55/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.3 pts
On https://genealogy.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 59/100
- 24 of 110 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- This page opens 24 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
- Add a Sitemap directive to robots.txt to help crawlers discover pages
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts
On https://genealogy.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts
On https://genealogy.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts
On https://genealogy.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
- Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
- Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts
On https://genealogy.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 853 words, 19 paragraphs, 15 lists, 2 tables, 31 images (3 with alt text)
- Content length (853 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 28 images missing alt text (e.g. …
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Place, Corporation, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Person, Article
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
3% of the overall score
Average 15 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 2, H3: 2. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 28 of 31 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("apg").
- 6 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 31 images but only ~853 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
19 render-blocking resources. 674 elements for 853 words
- 19 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 5 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 24 placeholder links
- 24 of 110 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 25/25. Has author
-
9% of the overall score
16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (2)
- No privacy policy link found
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
4 of 7 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 2 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
1 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 6/15/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 60 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 74/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
853 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Consulting / Professional Services sites
- AI Development Company & Engineering Partner (groovyweb.co) · 75/100
- Business Setup in Dubai & UAE Company Formation (dubaistartbusiness.com) · 71/100
- indapoint.com · 69/100
- Truvisory® (truvisory.com) · 69/100
- NexSphere (nexsphere.in) · 69/100
- Software Development Outsourcing Company (qarea.com) · 69/100
Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.