Kuroma Kuroma

lion.co.jp scores 38/100 for AI Readiness

Lion Corporation (lion.co.jp) is a Food & Beverage / CPG site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 38/100 (grade D), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is AI Readiness (22); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 1,715 Food & Beverage / CPG sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://lion.co.jp

38/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Answer Box Potential: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.2% of the total, which takes 7.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Above the median in Food & Beverage / CPG Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 1,715 audited sites in Food & Beverage / CPG

Is lion.co.jp ready for AI search?

Not yet: lion.co.jp scores 38/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 32
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 35
AI Readiness 30% of the score 22

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +7.2 pts

    On https://lion.co.jp · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +6.8 pts

    On https://lion.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 25/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://lion.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://lion.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://lion.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 81/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 668 words, 41 paragraphs, 35 lists, 23 images (20 with alt text)

    • Content length (668 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 3 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), (inline image), (inline image))
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 16 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • No headings a reader can see
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 23 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 10 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Company Overview", "Business Segment", "Sustainability").
    • 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 23 images but only ~668 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    10 render-blocking resources. 682 elements for 668 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 3 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 77/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 32/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 25/100

    9% of the overall score

    3 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 48/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 51/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 46 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 44/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 44/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    668 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Food & Beverage / CPG sites

Other Food & Beverage / CPG sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.