Kuroma Kuroma

openai.com scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

OpenAI (openai.com) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 43/100 (grade C), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (26); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar).

Audited URL: https://OpenAI.com

43/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is openai.com ready for AI search?

Partly: openai.com scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 43
Technical Optimization 79
Authority Signals 35
AI Readiness 26

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 80/100

    Found: 611 words, 22 paragraphs, 13 lists, 19 images (19 with alt text)

    • Content length (611 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 10/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    H1: 0, H2: 6, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("""", """").
    • 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 19 images but only ~611 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 3 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 34/100

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (23529ms). 18 render-blocking resources. 1090 elements for 611 words

    • Server response was slow (23529ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 18 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    Has viewport. 19 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • 2 of 89 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    15 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 43/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 73/100

    References current year. Last modified: 7/23/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    0 of 98 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.