Kuroma
opentreemap.org scores 64/100 for AI Readiness
Best Online Casinos in Canada 2026 (opentreemap.org) is a Government / GovTech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (74) and its weakest is Authority Signals (40); the biggest single gap is Trust & Brand Signals at 19/100 (No privacy policy link found). That places it in the top quartile of the 141 Government / GovTech sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://opentreemap.org
The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 19/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.3 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Government / GovTech Median 37 · Top quartile 41 · across 141 audited sites in Government / GovTech
Is opentreemap.org ready for AI search?
Largely yes: opentreemap.org scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add Trust Signals and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add Trust Signals up to +7.3 pts
On https://opentreemap.org · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 19/100
- No privacy policy link found
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
- Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts
On https://opentreemap.org · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 22/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts
On https://opentreemap.org · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.4 pts
On https://opentreemap.org · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 66/100
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
- This page opens 10 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Add a Sitemap directive to robots.txt to help crawlers discover pages
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.6 pts
On https://opentreemap.org · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 43/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 2789 words, 81 paragraphs, 20 lists, 1 images (1 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ section found (no schema). 11 question headings. 3 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Article, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Person
-
3% of the overall score
Average 11 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 17, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("opentreemap.org").
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
Fetch succeeded but was slow (6322ms). 7 render-blocking resources. 520 elements for 2789 words
- Server response was slow (6322ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 1 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 7/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
3 external links, 7 citation phrases, 68 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: Publisher schema (3 identity properties)
- No privacy policy link found
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
17 of 27 headings open a quotable passage, 12 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 24 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 7/10/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
36 of 149 passages carry a figure, 23 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 78/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
2789 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Government / GovTech sites
Other Government / GovTech sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.