Kuroma Kuroma

mipro.com.tw scores 55/100 for AI Readiness

MIPRO (mipro.com.tw) is a Manufacturing / Industrial site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 55/100 (grade B), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is Authority Signals (49); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 2,888 Manufacturing / Industrial sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://mipro.com.tw

55/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 46 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 46 days ago

Top 25% in Manufacturing / Industrial Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 2,888 audited sites in Manufacturing / Industrial

Is mipro.com.tw ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: mipro.com.tw scores 55/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 51
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 49
AI Readiness 30% of the score 49

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://mipro.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.9 pts

    On https://mipro.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 9/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://mipro.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.2 pts

    On https://mipro.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 68/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 263 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 81 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts

    On https://mipro.com.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 86/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1004 words, 222 paragraphs, 8 lists, 104 images (104 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 9/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 95/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 9. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 32/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("LOGO", "LOGO") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 94 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("wireless_systems", "antenna_systems", "iem_systems").
    • 91 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 104 images but only ~1004 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 1703 elements for 1004 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 76 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 68/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 263 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 48/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    23 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 64/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 50/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 60/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 81 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 11 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 70/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1004 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Manufacturing / Industrial sites

Other Manufacturing / Industrial sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.