Kuroma
complaix.io scores 47/100 for AI Readiness
Complaix (complaix.io) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 47/100 (grade C), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (62) and its weakest is AI Readiness (29); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it below the median of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://complaix.io
The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 15/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Below the median in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning
Is complaix.io ready for AI search?
Partly: complaix.io scores 47/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts
On https://complaix.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts
On https://complaix.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +6.7 pts
On https://complaix.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
- Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
- Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.9 pts
On https://complaix.io · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 55/100
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 2 of 54 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
- This page opens 21 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://complaix.io · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
The 17 checks scored on this page
Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
9.7% of the overall score
Found: 785 words, 41 paragraphs, 3 lists, 4 images (4 with alt text)
- Content length (785 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
-
Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
-
6.7% of the overall score
5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, Person, WebSite, Service, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage, DefinedTerm, WebPage, AboutPage, ItemList
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
4.5% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
4.1% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 15. Proper hierarchy.
-
Media Accessibility Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Complaix®", "Complaix®", "Complaix®").
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
Fetch succeeded but was slow (4322ms). 1 render-blocking resources. 657 elements for 785 words
- Server response was slow (4322ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 2 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 2 of 54 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (1)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
6 of 22 headings open a quotable passage, 5 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 73 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 81/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited AI / Machine Learning sites
- WebCoreLab (webcorelab.com) · 77/100
- AI-Moderated Customer Research Platform (userintuition.ai) · 77/100
- AI Solutions South Africa (smartaisolutions.co.za) · 76/100
- AI Consultancy UK (hartzai.com) · 75/100
- AI Receptionist for Business (agentzap.ai) · 73/100
- interprefy.com · 73/100
Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.