homodeus-ai.com scores 67/100 for AI Readiness
HomoDeus AI (homodeus-ai.com) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is AI Readiness (77) and its weakest is Authority Signals (51); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://homodeus-ai.com
The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 51/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.4 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning
Is homodeus-ai.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: homodeus-ai.com scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Improve Raw HTML Availability and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.4 pts
On https://homodeus-ai.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 51/100
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 5 of 11 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
- Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
- This page opens 5 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Add Trust Signals up to +5 pts
On https://homodeus-ai.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 45/100
- No privacy policy link found
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
- Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.3 pts
On https://homodeus-ai.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 36/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.3 pts
On https://homodeus-ai.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 39/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts
On https://homodeus-ai.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Add a references or sources section
The 17 checks scored on this page
Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
9.7% of the overall score
Found: 3179 words, 54 paragraphs, 11 lists, 53 images (53 with alt text)
-
Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
FAQ schema present. 22 question headings. 10 questions detected in content
-
6.7% of the overall score
3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: ItemList, WebSite, WebPage, Organization, LocalBusiness, FAQPage, VideoObject, HowTo
-
4.5% of the overall score
Average 11 words/sentence. 14 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
4.1% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 39. Proper hierarchy.
-
Media Accessibility Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 48 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Transfergest", "CNN Brasil", "Positivo Tecnologia").
- 49 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
14 render-blocking resources. 647 elements for 3179 words
- 14 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 5 of 11 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 7/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
1 external links, 20 citation phrases, 113 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
9% of the overall score
Present: Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Testimonials, Social profiles (1)
- No privacy policy link found
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
29 of 47 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
1 original data indicators, 88 percentages, 1 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References last year. Last modified: 8/16/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
31 of 96 passages carry a figure, 26 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 79/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited AI / Machine Learning sites
- WebCoreLab (webcorelab.com) · 77/100
- AI-Moderated Customer Research Platform (userintuition.ai) · 77/100
- AI Solutions South Africa (smartaisolutions.co.za) · 76/100
- AI Consultancy UK (hartzai.com) · 75/100
- AI Receptionist for Business (agentzap.ai) · 73/100
- interprefy.com · 73/100
Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.