Kuroma Kuroma

meta.com scores 13/100 for AI Readiness

Meta Store (meta.com) is a Social Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 13/100 (grade F), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (26) and its weakest is Authority Signals (5); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://meta.com

13/100
Grade
F

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is meta.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: meta.com scores 13/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 26
Technical Optimization 19
Authority Signals 5
AI Readiness 5

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 38/100

    Found: 60 words, 1 paragraphs, 9 images (8 with alt text)

    • Content length (60 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 1 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 44/100

    H1: 0, H2: 2, H3: 3. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 9 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Meta", "Meta").
    • 7 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 9 images but only ~60 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Fail 0/100

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3848ms). 56 render-blocking resources. 610 elements for 60 words

    • Server response was slow (3848ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 56 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
    • The page spends 610 HTML elements on 60 words of content, so crawlers parse far more markup than answer
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    Has viewport. 5 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Fail 0/100

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Noindex. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • Page has noindex directive
    • 2 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    0 of 4 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 36/100

    Score: 36/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Needs work 30/100

    60 words readable without JavaScript

    • Only 60 words are readable without JavaScript; AI crawlers run no JavaScript and will see very little of this page.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Social Platform sites

Other Social Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.