Kuroma
leans.ai scores 73/100 for AI Readiness
Bet Smarter (leans.ai) is a Artificial Intelligence site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 73/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (81) and its weakest is AI Readiness (67); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 48/100 (0 original data indicators, 23 percentages, 0 quotes.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://leans.ai
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 48/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 3.9 points off the overall score.
This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is leans.ai ready for AI search?
Largely yes: leans.ai scores 73/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.9 pts
On https://leans.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 48/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Update Content Freshness up to +2.9 pts
On https://leans.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 49/100
- Content appears to be over 6 months old
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Add Trust Signals up to +2.8 pts
On https://leans.ai · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 69/100
- No about or company page linked from this page
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
- Add customer testimonials or reviews
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.7 pts
On https://leans.ai · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 79/100
- 63 of 296 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- This page opens 86 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts
On https://leans.ai · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 4762 words, 68 paragraphs, 37 lists, 3 tables, 51 images (34 with alt text)
- 17 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 21 question headings. 5 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 13 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 2, H2: 27, H3: 20. Hierarchy issues.
- Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 6 of 40 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("payments").
- 10 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
34 render-blocking resources. 2235 elements for 4762 words
- 34 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 10 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 63 placeholder links
- 63 of 296 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 18/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author
-
9% of the overall score
14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 42 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)
- No about or company page linked from this page
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
34 of 58 headings open a quotable passage, 8 definitions, 3 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 23 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References last year. Last modified: 12/27/2025
- Content appears to be over 6 months old
-
5.1% of the overall score
11 of 153 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 85/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
4762 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Artificial Intelligence sites
- actionnetwork.com · 69/100
- 討論區 (playsport.cc) · 39/100
Other Artificial Intelligence sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.