Kuroma
actionnetwork.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness
actionnetwork.com is a Artificial Intelligence site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (91) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 22/100 (0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://actionnetwork.com
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.
This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is actionnetwork.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: actionnetwork.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Increase Citation-Worthy Content and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts
On https://actionnetwork.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://actionnetwork.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts
On https://actionnetwork.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100
- Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
- Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +2.6 pts
On https://actionnetwork.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 50/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
-
Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +2.4 pts
On https://actionnetwork.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 66/100
- 9 of your 71 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
- Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 2239 words, 32 paragraphs, 76 lists, 4 tables, 117 images (56 with alt text)
- 61 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 6 question headings. 1 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization
-
3% of the overall score
Average 9 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 0, H2: 4, H3: 63. Proper hierarchy.
- Missing H1 heading
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 61 of 117 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 3 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("image", "image", "image") that tells AI nothing about the content.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Playbook Banner").
- 105 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
1 render-blocking resources. 2479 elements for 2239 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 90 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 6 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author
-
9% of the overall score
16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (4)
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
9 of 71 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 4 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
6 of 221 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 6 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 66/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
2239 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Artificial Intelligence sites
- Bet Smarter (leans.ai) · 73/100
- 討論區 (playsport.cc) · 39/100
Other Artificial Intelligence sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.