Kuroma Kuroma

krazimo.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

AI Software Development Company (krazimo.com) is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://krazimo.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is krazimo.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: krazimo.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 58
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://krazimo.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://krazimo.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://krazimo.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://krazimo.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 49/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +2.9 pts

    On https://krazimo.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 68/100

    • Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2110 words, 33 paragraphs, 6 lists, 91 images (68 with alt text)

    • 23 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 73/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 8 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Person, Article

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 84/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 19. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 33/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 23 of 91 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 37 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Krazimo logo", "TMCnet-logo", "verified icon").
    • 33 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 1105 elements for 2110 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 86 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 49/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    25 external links, 0 citation phrases, 16 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 68/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 61/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    16 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 11 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 6/4/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 58/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    9 of 136 passages carry a figure, 4 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2110 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited software industry sites

Other software industry sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.