Kuroma Kuroma

www.lycorp.co.jp scores 40/100 for AI Readiness

LY Corporation (www.lycorp.co.jp) is a Internet site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 40/100 (grade D), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (61) and its weakest is AI Readiness (27); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.lycorp.co.jp

40/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 10/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 6.8 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Below the median in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is www.lycorp.co.jp ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.lycorp.co.jp scores 40/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 39
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 39
AI Readiness 30% of the score 27

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://www.lycorp.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.lycorp.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.lycorp.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +5.8 pts

    On https://www.lycorp.co.jp · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 20/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.6 pts

    On https://www.lycorp.co.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 57/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at www.lycorp.co.jp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.lycorp.co.jp — the response we received could not be parsed as one

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 69/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 736 words, 10 paragraphs, 40 lists, 36 images (21 with alt text)

    • Content length (736 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 15 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/images/icon_search.png, /assets/images/top/scroll_arr.svg, /ja/company/jp/common/LY_siteKV_corporate_2026.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 92/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 38/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 14 of 35 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("LY Corporation", "X", "YouTube").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 35 images but only ~736 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    10 render-blocking resources. 751 elements for 736 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 12 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 57/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at www.lycorp.co.jp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 56/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 10 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 49/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/30/2023

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 53 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    736 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Internet sites

Other Internet sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.