Kuroma Kuroma

redcode-web.design scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

redcode-web.design is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is AI Readiness (50); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://redcode-web.design

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 37/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 4.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is redcode-web.design ready for AI search?

Largely yes: redcode-web.design scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 88
Authority Signals 25% of the score 63
AI Readiness 30% of the score 50

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.7 pts

    On https://redcode-web.design · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 37/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://redcode-web.design · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts

    On https://redcode-web.design · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.3 pts

    On https://redcode-web.design · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 15/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://redcode-web.design · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2182 words, 141 paragraphs, 7 lists, 76 images (76 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 59/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 6 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ProfessionalService, WebPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 86/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 17 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 22. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 46/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 54 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("RedCode Logo", "Hero", "Design").
    • 72 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 76 images but only ~2182 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    0 render-blocking resources. 1438 elements for 2182 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 24 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • 11 of 262 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 64/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 17/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 76/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 79/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 8 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 37/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 15/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 101 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2182 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited software industry sites

Other software industry sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.