Kuroma Kuroma

naturemade.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

naturemade.com is a Supplements & Functional Foods site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is AI Readiness (48); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://naturemade.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is naturemade.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: naturemade.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 70
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 67
AI Readiness 30% of the score 48

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://naturemade.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.4 pts

    On https://naturemade.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 25/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.4 pts

    On https://naturemade.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 52/100

    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.3 pts

    On https://naturemade.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 75/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 69 of 406 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • robots.txt asks crawlers to wait 10s between requests, which limits how much of this site they reach
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.3 pts

    On https://naturemade.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 35/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3851 words, 107 paragraphs, 41 lists, 1 tables, 121 images (54 with alt text)

    • 67 images missing alt text (e.g. //www.naturemade.com/cdn/shop/t/517/assets/arrow-up.png?v=70406451077519223371787001664, //www.naturemade.com/cdn/shop/files/Global_Marketing_Card_Navigation_Card_2_720x310_9614f279-9aca-4567-a6e5-a0c3a2796…
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 87/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 7. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 57/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("90", "80", "B-Complex Gummies").
    • 34 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    30 render-blocking resources. 4000 elements for 3851 words

    • 30 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 27 responsive images. has theme-color

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 69 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 69 of 406 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 52/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 7/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    19 external links, 0 citation phrases, 30 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (6)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 78/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    10 of 25 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 1 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 58/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 4 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 35/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 314 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Supplements & Functional Foods sites

Other Supplements & Functional Foods sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.