Kuroma Kuroma

doublewoodsupplements.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

Double Wood Supplements (doublewoodsupplements.com) is a Supplements & Functional Foods site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is AI Readiness (54); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 16/100 (2 of 63 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://doublewoodsupplements.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 43/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 5.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is doublewoodsupplements.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: doublewoodsupplements.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 59
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 67
AI Readiness 30% of the score 54

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://doublewoodsupplements.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  2. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.3 pts

    On https://doublewoodsupplements.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 16/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +3.6 pts

    On https://doublewoodsupplements.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 37/100

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.4 pts

    On https://doublewoodsupplements.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 25/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.2 pts

    On https://doublewoodsupplements.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 51/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 78/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1122 words, 109 paragraphs, 20 lists, 39 images (16 with alt text)

    • 23 images missing alt text (e.g. //doublewoodsupplements.com/cdn/shop/files/2.jpg?v=1720643993, //doublewoodsupplements.com/cdn/shop/files/Header-Slide-Show---Mobile_b875ae0e-2495-4d1b-a0c2-b9c50a29c361.gif?v=1781277468&width=1200, //doubl…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 51/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 87/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 15, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 23 of 39 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 32 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 39 images but only ~1122 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 8 image(s) load only via JavaScript (lazy/data-src), and most AI crawlers run no JavaScript and never see them.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    8 render-blocking resources. 1343 elements for 1122 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 6 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 10 placeholder links

    • 10 of 117 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 67/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 91/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (6)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 70/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 17 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 58/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 4 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 37/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 10/21/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 16/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 63 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1122 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Supplements & Functional Foods sites

Other Supplements & Functional Foods sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.