Kuroma Kuroma

polarise.eu scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Polarise (polarise.eu) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (86) and its weakest is Authority Signals (51); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://polarise.eu

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 20/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 6 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is polarise.eu ready for AI search?

Largely yes: polarise.eu scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 58
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 86
Authority Signals 25% of the score 51
AI Readiness 30% of the score 61

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://polarise.eu · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://polarise.eu · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.9 pts

    On https://polarise.eu · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 25/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4 pts

    On https://polarise.eu · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 43/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts

    On https://polarise.eu · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1388 words, 65 paragraphs, 5 lists, 2 tables, 34 images (34 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 25/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 77/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 40. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 19 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Polarise", "Polarise", "Andreas Falkner").
    • 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 34 images but only ~1388 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 1232 elements for 1388 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 34 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 87 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 43/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 73/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (1)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 71/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 53 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 2 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 2 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/18/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 73/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 116 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 5 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 58/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1388 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.