Kuroma Kuroma

rasa.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Rasa (rasa.com) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (83) and its weakest is AI Readiness (47); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 372 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://rasa.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.7% of the total, which takes 6.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 372 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is rasa.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: rasa.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 63
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 83
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 47

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +6.7 pts

    On https://rasa.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://rasa.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://rasa.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.7 pts

    On https://rasa.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 49/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 10 of your 32 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.2 pts

    On https://rasa.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 55/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 75/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 2244 words, 85 paragraphs, 76 images (38 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 38 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, ItemList, ContactPage

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 100/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 9 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 99/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 18, H3: 5. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 38 of 76 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Autodesk", "Groupe IMA", "Swisscom").
    • 56 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 76 images but only ~2244 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 1609 elements for 2244 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 20 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links

    • 5 of 115 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 55/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 13 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 71/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    10 of 32 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 11 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 43/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    6 of 167 passages carry a figure, 4 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2244 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.