Kuroma Kuroma

kantiv.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

Pursuit Intelligence Platform for AEC firms (kantiv.com) is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (55); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://kantiv.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is kantiv.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: kantiv.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 58
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 68
AI Readiness 30% of the score 55

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://kantiv.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.6 pts

    On https://kantiv.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 9/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://kantiv.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://kantiv.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.6 pts

    On https://kantiv.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 80/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 57 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 36 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 70/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1585 words, 27 paragraphs, 58 images (27 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 31 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 65/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 7 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, WebPage, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 93/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 79/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 10, H3: 6. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 30 of 57 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("kantiv statistics", "Kantiv on X").
    • 12 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 57 images but only ~1585 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 1138 elements for 1585 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 22 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 57 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 71/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 78/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 82/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 6/12/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 9/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 91 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 59/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 59/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1585 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited software industry sites

Other software industry sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.