Kuroma Kuroma

chugai-tec.co.jp scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

chugai-tec.co.jp is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 44/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (64) and its weakest is Authority Signals (31); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://chugai-tec.co.jp

44/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

Updated 1 day ago

Above the median in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is chugai-tec.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: chugai-tec.co.jp scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 49
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 64
Authority Signals 25% of the score 31
AI Readiness 30% of the score 38

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://chugai-tec.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://chugai-tec.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.8 pts

    On https://chugai-tec.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 17/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://chugai-tec.co.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 39/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +5.1 pts

    On https://chugai-tec.co.jp · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 29/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 1 of your 6 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 84/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 850 words, 56 paragraphs, 30 lists, 66 images (66 with alt text)

    • Content length (850 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 38 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Contact form", "Download", "search").
    • 31 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 66 images but only ~850 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    27 render-blocking resources. 737 elements for 850 words

    • 27 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 68/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 164 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, Google-Extended, CCBot. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 17/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    33 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 39/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 29/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 6 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 45/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    3 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 69/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 72 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Consulting / Professional Services sites

Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.